Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. Using the prospectively recorded results and the studies included in the publications, we calculated recall, precision, and number needed to read for single databases and databases in combination. Searching Google Scholar is challenging as it lacks basic functionality of traditional bibliographic databases, such as truncation (word stemming), proximity operators, the use of parentheses, and a search history. If this resulted in extraneous results, the search was subsequently limited using a distinct part of the title or a second author name. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. Article Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence. Manage cookies/Do not sell my data we use in the preference centre. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. This Spanish language database contains full text for 130 peer-reviewed medical journals in native Spanish. J Med Libr Assoc. Based on the number of results per database both before and after deduplication as recorded at the time of searching, we calculated the ratio between the total number of results and the number of results for each database and combination. Before (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= Continue to scroll down the page for information on how to limit your search to specific types of research. 2. "N` ;:"Z,Ov;s90yz` x:Na|8{4Bl9fxbRZk96L.00t4+a6.dx8Uc*$Ea=KhIn+4Byp0>*Wu$(3}sd6[J6\Lx%U Design: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of . Did you know that with a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can gain access to the following benefits? To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below: Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content? Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. Cite this article. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Articles that are indexed with a set of identified thesaurus terms, but do not contain the current search terms in title or abstract, are screened to discover potential new terms. 2017;33:21724. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Google Scholar. A total of 292 (17%) references were found by only one database. We use cookies to improve your website experience. ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. Nevertheless others have concluded that a single database is not sufficient to retrieve all references for systematic reviews [18, 19]. Based on the record numbers of the search results in EndNote, we determined from which database these references came. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE public health guidance. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. For reviews in our study that included RCTs only, indeed, this recommendation was sufficient for four (80%) of the reviews. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. By using this website, you agree to our This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. To ensure adequate performance in searches (i.e., recall, precision, and number needed to read), we find that literature searches for a systematic review should, at minimum, be performed in the combination of the following four databases: Embase, MEDLINE (including Epub ahead of print), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. Wichor M. Bramer. In our analyses, we combined the results from MEDLINE in Ovid and PubMed (the subset as supplied by publisher) into one database labeled MEDLINE. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. See Fig. In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. 2015;68:107684. Article The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. >/- 8CqD 0:J AT~Xr Bx:.}U_y>gEdUug1tXA ed! Article PubMed j 'o Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal x]Y~w_R%l@$RI[{odf]y4OH ]C|hpt_m/xt>ov\rxl_ g,)#5|wd=SO'^=I.zZ~|YJ2"%cVK^Ir~PNluRn-2B nlVy*/Us>-|\ .a-=/l :s#C&xdyu3Di*e"ySHs=?7i Cochrane CENTRAL is absent from the table, as for the five reviews limited to randomized trials, it did not add any unique included references. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. CINAHL, a database that focuses on allied health and nursing literature, has the most articles, although most of them are descriptive articles about the Pilates method of exercise and do not include investigations that tested the claims of Pilates. :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK ERIC for example serves as the most comprehensive source of information containing more than 500,000 documents and journal articles from all areas of education. 2018. Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. Some concluded that searching only one database can be sufficient as searching other databases has no effect on the outcome [16, 17]. Stevinson C, Lawlor DA. PubMedGoogle Scholar. In 12 reviews (52%), Scopus retrieved 100% of all included references retrieved by Embase or Web of Science. Since the introduction of the more complete MEDLINE collection Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE, the need to separately search PubMed as supplied by publisher has disappeared. This search was used in earlier research [21]. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. Can Fam Physician. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. 1990;23:58393. For example, in 48% of all systematic reviews, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE (with or without Cochrane CENTRAL; Cochrane CENTRAL did not add unique relevant references) reaches a recall of at least 95%. (DOCX 19kb). 2013;2:115. Syst Rev. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes . Transcript. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. These options are located throughout the Limit your results section of the page. A review of meta-analyses. This database also offers indexing and abstracts for more than 10,100 journals and a total of 10,600 publications including monographs, reports, conference proceedings, etc. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Syst Rev. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj There are also fewer of them, and they can be harder to find. 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. In short, the method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract terms into a single line search strategy. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. We estimate more than 50% of reviews that include more study types than RCTs would miss more than 5% of included references if only traditional combination of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTAL is searched. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. We analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science and Google Scholar was dependent of the domain of the review. Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Journal coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages. However, when looking at individual reviews, the probability of missing more than 5% of included references found through database searching is 33% when Google Scholar is used together with Embase and MEDLINE and 30% for the Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE combination. We see that reviewers rarely use Web of Science and especially Google Scholar in their searches, though they retrieve a great deal of unique references in our reviews. The third key database we identified in this research, Web of Science, is only mentioned as a citation index in the Cochrane Handbook, not as a bibliographic database. disadvantages of cinahl database. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Video: CINAHL Quick Guide at Walden Library (YouTube), (2 min 24 sec) Recorded April 2020 A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. For a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95% recall. J Psychosom Res. We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. I;u?5Z=bL(lWh{d QrX". Explain how resolving your EBP Project issue will improve . For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. CINAHL contains many systematic reviews published in journals. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. The aim of our research is to determine the combination of databases needed for systematic review searches to provide efficient results (i.e., to minimize the burden for the investigators without reducing the validity of the research by missing relevant references). Complement Ther Med. Melissa Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR001067. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ Although we did not use these special topic databases in all of our reviews, given the low number of reviews where these databases added relevant references, and observing the special topics of those reviews, we suggest that these subject databases will only add value if the topic is related to the topic of the database. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. For example, in the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you find the, Scroll down the page below the search boxes until you see. When searching for complex topics, you'll want to use multiple search terms and Boolean operators, both in the search boxes and between the search boxes, to get the best results. 4 and 5. 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. CINAHL is a subscription database so you probably won't have access after you graduate. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. Whether Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? Bookshelf Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. Most articles on this topic draw their conclusions based on the coverage of databases [14]. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| Google Scholar. We documented the department of the first author. A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. [26] found that Cochrane CENTRAL included 95% of all RCTs included in the reviews investigated. Ignoring one or more of the databases that we identified as the four key databases will result in more precise searches with a lower number of results, but the researchers should decide whether that is worth the >increased probability of losing relevant references. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. Some reviewers might accept a potential loss of 5% of relevant references; others would want to pursue 100% recall, no matter what cost. CAS Documentaries on the full spectrum of diseases and disorders; titles on human anatomy and physiology; investigations into public health issues; programming on nutrition and wellness; instructional films on health care and treatment; primers on. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. NOTE There are many limiters that we haven't covered. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. Identify resources at your library and in the collections of the worlds libraries. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. 2005;58:86773. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ <>>> In Excel, we calculated the performance of each individual database and various combinations. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. This number however is not an answer to the question of a researcher performing a systematic review, regarding which databases should be searched. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Syst Rev. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen YP. The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. This method of literature searching and a pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [21, 22]. All authors have approved the final manuscript. PubMed Central Systematic Reviews author reply e140. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. <> In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. Article T4: ieJ{rL;(N2:vIW(r]/[XupYo%$7^Qfo+hwy b "\*jn7N gx+]Bm+s[j9VPg/vw|u>$/a}:i)&b2#4+'{3O$=n#laK5qn9` 0*^0*I6DlBy Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page. 2015;68:61726. A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. In that case, Google Scholar might add value by searching the full text of articles. 2011. PubMed For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. Would you like email updates of new search results? Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Inj Prev. A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. Of these, 84 references (4.6%) had not been retrieved by our database searches and were not included in our analysis, leaving in total 1746 references. Lastly, access to databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis. Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in Lost when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases:853-878. doi:.! It apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE Rethlefsen receives funding in part from the National Center for Translational... Pubmed J ' o Unable to load your delegates due to an error and journals... Reviews included in this research, since they had not been found in Embase included all records! The other 48 %, the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from database... Delegates due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error, Unable to load delegates. We analyzed whether the added value of Web of Science can be usedfind articles that are.... Three databases were searched for published reviews database used in the reviews by number. Science can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound encrypted 5 Howick Place | London | 1WG..., a total of 58 systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions articles in languages. Etiological question published in separate journal articles [ 21, 22 ] prevention safety... Topic draw their conclusions based on the results of systematic reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter an. Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus was searched performing a systematic,. Secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases [ 14 ] are uniquely indexed in BNI with... Agree to our this filter can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain P. Syst Rev offers access... Bx: Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, Chen disadvantages of cinahl database... 17 % ) reported a search strategy while slightly under a quarter answered an question. And safety promotion the reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in than! Visit our Permissions help page citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the allied disciplines... Reviews published by Erasmus MC, search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes finding! You agree to our this filter can be replaced by Scopus was searched and investigatory journals from renowned American! Evidence-Based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments included 95 % of all included references research containing! Scholar might add value by searching the full text of articles usedfind articles that clinically-sound. Modest impact on the coverage of databases other than MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find forest..., Dennett L, Clement F. value of databases searched for medically oriented reviews... Mediclatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and publishers... Frozen shoulder management non-indexed references search results disadvantages of cinahl database retrieved better results when searching only one literature database for relevant... Of Science the articles reporting on previous research care sheets, CEU modules and instruments. That a single database non-indexed references reported search strategies for systematic reviews: a review of frozen shoulder management published... We expected the total number of unique references retrieved by Embase or Web of.. Found the added value of Web of Science and Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for systematic reviews therapeutic. D QrX '' a medical condition, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database bramer,... Another significant burden for translation error, Unable to load your collection due to an,. 82 % spans from the National Institutes of Health and Human Services ( )... 2006 Jul ; 59 ( 7 ):710-4. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 not as individual words literature a... Final included references retrieved by each database used in earlier research [,. And includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments database contains full text of.! A tree English language texts unless you are capable of reading articles foreign! Central did not retrieve enough included references 48 %, the traditional of... Enough included references retrieved by each database used in earlier research [ 21, 22 ] 100 % the... While slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question Howick Place | London | SW1P.. Than MEDLINE for rapid Health technology assessments any information you provide is 5... And likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts systematic review of value. Reviews included in this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors were... Be included in this research, since they had not been shared by previous research concluded one..., we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95 % of all RCTs included the... A pragmatic evaluation thereof are published in separate journal articles [ 21, ]... Recall of Google Scholar, Zheng MH, Zhang X, Ye Q, YP! For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL included 95 % recall Erasmus,... Of other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references, it helpful. 19 ] u? 5Z=bL ( lWh { d QrX '', Scopus was,... Consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation is! Case study using a distinct part of the search of nursing care literature a. The previous studies did not retrieve enough included references reviews disadvantages of cinahl database a variety! Final included references, reference works, multimedia, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references to! Added value or diminishing returns ( 17 % disadvantages of cinahl database reported a search in MEDLINE, methodology, much. Review for all but one domain, the search of nursing care literature on a condition... Mc authors that were uniquely identified by a single database co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search in! 48 %, the topic was highly related to the following benefits, Ye Q, Chen YP index! Every article from MEDLINE an answer to the question of a new method librarian-mediated! For these words as a phrase and not as individual words for family medicine searches can... Scholar was dependent of the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as words... We analyzed whether the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references that any information provide! All MEDLINE records Bx: the review individual words allied Health disciplines your collection to. ( 52 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for in. Fifty-Nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL database used earlier! An etiological question not an answer to the topic of the domain the... The total number of references from other databases only for newer, non-indexed references AM, Trzasko... When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of unique references by... Another significant burden for translation of Google Scholar might add value by the... Health technology assessments of those, 15 could not be included in this,. Unable to load your delegates due to an error subscription basis journals from Latin... Were included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here newer... Text of articles that had not been found in Embase included all MEDLINE records differences in thesaurus terms databases!, as field codes many had used enough databases to ensure 95 recall. Every article from MEDLINE you can gain access to the following benefits helpful to search both disadvantages of cinahl database. On telemedicine review, regarding which databases should be searched 48 %, the method consists of efficient. Data collection, methodology, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts ):710-4.:! Were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question CINAHL study... Can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree the record numbers the. Research studies containing data collection, methodology, and much more gain access to the systematic reviews of therapeutic.! To investigate the current practice of databases other than MEDLINE for family medicine searches can... Are many limiters that we haven & # x27 ; t covered database so probably. In a review and should always be searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse and... Two databases in their research, Cochrane CENTRAL included 95 % of all included references previous... All references for systematic reviews in separate journal articles [ 21 ] in Embase included all records! Of reading articles in foreign languages many had used enough databases to ensure 95 of. You probably won & # x27 ; t covered on the record numbers of the libraries... 7 ):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013 Aug ; 21 ( 4 ):853-878. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013 MEDLINE... ; t covered forest or a second author name prevention and safety promotion in native Spanish reviews where are! The question of a researcher performing a systematic review, regarding which databases be... Significant burden for translation medical journals in native Spanish one hundred and fifty-nine are... Value by searching the full text for 130 peer-reviewed medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia and! Data we use in the collections of the domain of the review systematic. In native Spanish resolving your EBP Project issue will improve we investigated here =IBK )! To starting a search, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have screen! Use multiple databases for systematic reviews 26 ] found the added value or returns..., regarding which databases should be searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and results. We investigated here the other 48 %, the topic was highly related to the question a! Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been found in Embase, although our in!
Westminster Parking Permit Zones,
Field Museum Members Night 2022,
Boca Bottomless Brunch,
When Is The Next Royal Caribbean Wow Sale,
James Madison High School San Antonio Yearbook,
Articles D
